Frontiers in Educational Research, 2026, 9(6); doi: 10.25236/FER.2026.090612.
Xiaoyu Huang, Panjing Feng
Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing, China
Existing research on community education policy in China predominantly adopts a descriptive approach to policy text analysis or focuses on policy instrument allocation, failing to adequately reveal the dialectical interaction between institutional constraints and discursive practices, and leaving unaddressed the deep mechanism of 'ecological reconstruction' in policy evolution. This study constructs a dual analytical framework of 'institutional constraints–discursive practices,' integrating Scott's three-pillar model of institutions and Fairclough's critical discourse analysis, to systematically examine the evolutionary logic of China's community education policy based on twenty-one national-level policy documents. The findings reveal three stages of evolution: the institutional establishment period, characterized by regulative dominance and passive acceptance practices; the institutional expansion period, marked by the strengthening of normative constraints and negotiated practices; and the institutional deepening period, featuring the construction of cultural-cognitive constraints and participatory practices. The interaction between institutional constraints and discursive practices exhibits a dialectical logic of 'constraint–negotiation–reconstruction,' with four groups of structural tensions constituting the endogenous driver of ecological reconstruction. This study provides a theoretical tool for moving beyond the 'institution–discourse' dualism and offers a Chinese case for international research on policy discourse and implementation.
Community Education Policy, Institutional Constraints, Discursive Practices, Ecological Reconstruction, Paradigm Evolution
Xiaoyu Huang, Panjing Feng. From Institutional Constraints to Discursive Practices: Paradigm Evolution and Ecological Reconstruction of Community Education Policy in China. Frontiers in Educational Research (2026), Vol. 9, Issue 6: 89-96. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2026.090612.
[1] Yao, J. S., & Song, X. X. (2021). Quantitative analysis of community education policy texts in China from the perspective of policy tools. Education and Vocation, (19), 75-82.
[2] Hou, H. Y., & Shang, R. X. (2018). Review and prospect of community education policies in the forty years of reform and opening-up. Lifelong Education Research, 29(3), 3-10.
[3] Ding, H. (2018). Review, comment and prospect of the development of community education policies in China since the reform and opening-up. Education and Vocation, (24), 66-72.
[4] Sun, L. (2019). Influencing factors and optimization paths of community education policy implementation: An analysis based on Smith’s model. Communication of Vocational Education, (17), 39-45.
[5] Yu, J., Hu, M. Y., & Li, Y. M. (2022). Research on contemporary community education policies in China: Overview, review, evaluation and prospect. Journal of Shandong Open University, (2), 12–15, 19.
[6] North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[7] Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
[8] Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Sage Publications.
[9] Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Tavistock Publications.