Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2026, 8(8); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2026.080810.

An Empirical Study on the Impacts of Crude Oil Prices and Investor Sentiment on Soybean Futures Returns

Author(s)

Naiqiong Ke, Xin Liao, Jiayi Zhao

Corresponding Author:
Xin Liao
Affiliation(s)

Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China

Abstract

In recent years, with the deepening of the financialization of commodities, the influence of crude oil prices and investor sentiment on the returns of soybean futures has become increasingly significant. This paper conducts an empirical analysis of daily data from 2020 to 2025. Through principal component analysis, a comprehensive investor sentiment index is constructed, and a time-varying parameter vector autoregression (TVP-VAR) model is adopted. The research results show that the current period's crude oil prices have a mainly positive impact on the returns of soybean futures, followed by a similar negative adjustment with similar amplitudes, and the transmission direction varies in different market conditions. The direction of the impact of investor sentiment on the returns of soybean futures shows alternating positive and negative fluctuations. During extreme events such as the pandemic, the intensity of the negative impact is significantly amplified. Based on the above research conclusions, it is recommended that investors promptly assess the risk of their positions on the day when oil prices fluctuate sharply, and actively reduce their positions in extreme situations. Enterprises should lock in energy costs through crude oil futures and diversify their sources of soybean imports. Regulatory authorities suggest including sentiment indicators in daily monitoring to prevent excessive speculation.

Keywords

Crude Oil Price, Investor Sentiment, Soybean Futures Market, TVP-VAR

Cite This Paper

Naiqiong Ke, Xin Liao, Jiayi Zhao. An Empirical Study on the Impacts of Crude Oil Prices and Investor Sentiment on Soybean Futures Returns. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2026), Vol. 8, Issue 8: 79-86. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2026.080810.

References

[1] Das N, Tanin T I, Gangopadhyay P, et al. Quantile VAR connectedness and price spillovers between soybean and energy[J]. Energy Economics, 2025, 149: 108774.

[2] Wang X, Pu M, Sun S, et al. Study of volatility spillover from crude oil futures to grain futures across multiple cycles based on the EEMD-BEKK-GARCH model[J]. Agriculture (Switzerland), 2025, 15(1): 67.

[3] Mensi W, Rehman M U, Vo X V, et al. Risk spillovers and diversification benefits between crude oil and agricultural commodity futures markets[J]. International Review of Economics and Finance, 2024, 96: 103726.

[4] Jiang Y, Ma Y, Cheng S. How economic policy uncertainty affects asymmetric spillovers in food and oil prices: Evidence from wavelet analysis[J]. Resources Policy, 2023, 86(Part B): 104086.

[5] Wang C. Investor sentiment and return predictability in agricultural futures markets[J]. Journal of Futures Markets, 2001, 21(10): 929-952.

[6] Wu J, Murphy F, Garvey J, et al. The role of market participants in agricultural futures markets[J]. Outlook on Agriculture, 2015, 44(2): 97-108.

[7] Yan B, Liang M, Zhao Y. Market sentiment and price dynamics in weak markets: A comprehensive empirical analysis of the soybean meal option market[J]. Journal of Futures Markets, 2024, 44(5): 744-766.

[8] Qayum M. A sentiment-based approach to convenience yield dynamics in commodity futures markets[D]. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, 2025.

[9] Primiceri G E. Time varying structural vector autoregressions and monetary policy[J]. The Review of economic studies, 2005, 72(3): 821-852.

[10] Nakajima  J.  Time-varying  parameter  VAR  model  with  stochastic  volatility:  An  overview  of methodology and empirical applications[J]. Monetary and Economic Studies, 2011, 29: 107-142.

[11] Baker M, Wurgler J. Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 2006, 61(4): 1645-1680.