Glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) from Bacillus megateriumIWG3 is a NAD(P)⁺-dependent oxidoreductase widely used in biosensing and biocatalytic NADPH regeneration. However, its intrinsic preference for NAD⁺ over NADP⁺ limits its application in NADPH-driven processes. Here, we report a structure-guided rational design to invert the coenzyme specificity of GDH by targeting a single residue within the conserved GXXXGXG motif of the Rossmann fold. Molecular docking and structural analysis identified Thr17 as the key residue forming a hydrogen bond with the 2′-hydroxyl of NAD⁺, thereby discriminating against the 2′-phosphate of NADP⁺. Three-point mutants—T17G, T17K, and T17R—were constructed, expressed, and kinetically characterized. The T17G mutation dramatically inverted cofactor preference, increasing the catalytic efficiency ratio (NADP⁺/NAD⁺) from 0.78 (wild-type) to 7.5, driven by a 2.4-fold decrease for NADP⁺ and a 4.6-fold increase in for NAD⁺. Remarkably, the T17K mutant not only shifted preference toward NADP⁺ (specificity ratio 0.96) but also enhanced turnover numbers for both coenzymes by up to 5.2-fold, achieving catalytic efficiencies of 6.39 mM⁻¹·s⁻¹ (NAD⁺) and 6.15 mM⁻¹·s⁻¹ (NADP⁺)—the highest among all variants tested. In contrast, the T17R mutation severely impaired NADP⁺ binding (km= 97.18 mM) and abolished activity. Structural modeling revealed that glycine creates space to accommodate the 2′-phosphate, while lysine establishes a favorable electrostatic interaction with the phosphate group; arginine’s bulky guanidinium group causes steric clash. This study demonstrates that a single, rationally designed mutation at position 17 can simultaneously broaden cofactor specificity and improve catalytic efficiency, with the T17K mutant emerging as a superior biocatalyst for NADPH regeneration. The strategy provides a generalizable framework for engineering cofactor preference in short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family enzymes.

Yujiao Shen, Keju Jing. Effect of Structure-Guided Single Mutant on Nicotinamide Coenzyme Specificity of Glucose Dehydrogenase from Bacillus Megaterium. International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering Technology (2026), Vol. 8, Issue 2: 104-112. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFET.2026.080213.

[1] C. You, R. Huang, X. Wei, Z. Zhu, Y.P. Zhang, Protein engineering of oxidoreductases utilizing nicotinamide-based coenzymes, with applications in synthetic biology, Synth Syst Biotechnol, 2 (2017) 208-218.

[2] L. Selles Vidal, C.L. Kelly, P.M. Mordaka, J.T. Heap, Review of NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductases: Properties, engineering and application, Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom, 1866 (2018) 327-347.

[3] H. Wu, C. Tian, X. Song, C. Liu, D. Yang, Z. Jiang, Methods for the regeneration of nicotinamide coenzymes, Green Chemistry, 15 (2013) 1773.

[4] Z. Xu, K. Jing, Y. Liu, P. Cen, High-level expression of recombinant glucose dehydrogenase and its application in NADPH regeneration, Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 34 (2007) 83-90.

[5] A.B.R.N.P. Nigel S. Scrutton, Redesign of the coenzyme specificity of a dehygrogenase by protein engineering., nature, (1990).

[6] A. Andreadeli, D. Platis, V. Tishkov, V. Popov, N.E. Labrou, Structure-guided alteration of coenzyme specificity of formate dehydrogenase by saturation mutagenesis to enable efficient utilization of NADP+, FEBS J, 275 (2008) 3859-3869.

[7] S. Watanabe, T. Kodaki, K. Makino, Complete reversal of coenzyme specificity of xylitol dehydrogenase and increase of thermostability by the introduction of structural zinc, J Biol Chem, 280 (2005) 10340-10349.

[8] H. Zheng, D. Bertwistle, D.A. Sanders, D.R. Palmer, Converting NAD-specific inositol dehydrogenase to an efficient NADP-selective catalyst, with a surprising twist, Biochemistry, 52 (2013) 5876-5883.

[9] G.P. Ozgun, E.B. Ordu, H.E. Tutuncu, E. Yelboga, R.B. Sessions, N. Gul Karaguler, Site Saturation Mutagenesis Applications on Candida methylica Formate Dehydrogenase, Scientifica (Cairo), 2016 (2016) 4902450.

[10] W.A.v.d.D. Ryan Woodyer, and Huimin Zhao, Relaxing the Nicotinamide Cofactor Specificity of Phosphite Dehydrogenase by rational design123., Biochemistry, (2003) 11604-11614.

[11] K.R. Haiching Ma, |and Trevor M. Penning, Mutation of Nicotinamide Pocket Residues in Rat Liver 3R-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Reveals Different Modes of Cofactor Binding., Biochemistry, (2000).

[12] J.E. Carmen Pire, Juan Ferrer, Mar Bonete. Heterologous overexpression of glucose dehydrogenase from the halophilic archaeon Haloferax mediterranei., FEMS Microbiology Letter, (2001) 221-227.

[13] S. Banta, B.A. Swanson, S. Wu, A. Jarnagin, S. Anderson, Alteration of the specificity of the cofactor-binding pocket of Corynebacterium 2,5-diketo-D-gluconic acid reductase A, Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, 15 (2002) 131-140.

[14] C. Pire, J. Esclapez, S. Díaz, F. Pérez-Pomares, J. Ferrer, M.J. Bonete, Alteration of coenzyme specificity in halophilic NAD(P)+ glucose dehydrogenase by site-directed mutagenesis, Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 59 (2009) 261-265.

[15] S. Bastian, X. Liu, J.T. Meyerowitz, C.D. Snow, M.M. Chen, F.H. Arnold, Engineered ketol-acid reductoisomerase and alcohol dehydrogenase enable anaerobic 2-methylpropan-1-ol production at theoretical yield in Escherichia coli, Metab Eng, 13 (2011) 345-352.

[16] A.M. Chanique, L.P. Parra, Protein Engineering for Nicotinamide Coenzyme Specificity in Oxidoreductases: Attempts and Challenges, Frontiers in microbiology, 9 (2018) 194.

[17] E. Campbell, I.R. Wheeldon, S. Banta, Broadening the cofactor specificity of a thermostable alcohol dehydrogenase using rational protein design introduces novel kinetic transient behavior, Biotechnol Bioeng, 107 (2010) 763-774.

[18] T. Knaus, C.E. Paul, C.W. Levy, S. de Vries, F.G. Mutti, F. Hollmann, N.S. Scrutton, Better than Nature: Nicotinamide Biomimetics That Outperform Natural Coenzymes, J Am Chem Soc, 138 (2016) 1033-1039.

[19] C. Nowak, A. Pick, P. Lommes, V. Sieber, Enzymatic Reduction of Nicotinamide Biomimetic Cofactors Using an Engineered Glucose Dehydrogenase: Providing a Regeneration System for Artificial Cofactors, ACS Catalysis, 7 (2017) 5202-5208.

[20] C.E. Paul, I.W.C.E. Arends, F. Hollmann, Is Simpler Better? Synthetic Nicotinamide Cofactor Analogues for Redox Chemistry, ACS Catalysis, 4 (2014) 788-797.

[21] M.Z. Erik Wernera, Felicitas Lernerb, Manfred Schweigerb, Udo Heinemann, Crystal structure of human nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase in complex with NMN, FEBS Letters, (2002) 239-244.

[22] C.E. Paul, F. Hollmann, A survey of synthetic nicotinamide cofactors in enzymatic processes, Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 100 (2016) 4773-4778.

[23] E. Campbell, M. Meredith, S.D. Minteer, S. Banta, Enzymatic biofuel cells utilizing a biomimetic cofactor, Chem Commun (Camb), 48 (2012) 1898-1900.

[24] G.A. Khoury, H. Fazelinia, J.W. Chin, R.J. Pantazes, P.C. Cirino, C.D. Maranas, Computational design ofCandida boidiniixylose reductase for altered cofactor specificity, Protein Science, 18 (2009) 2125-2138.

[25] D. Cui, L. Zhang, S. Jiang, Z. Yao, B. Gao, J. Lin, Y.A. Yuan, D. Wei, A computational strategy for altering an enzyme in its cofactor preference to NAD(H) and/or NADP(H), The FEBS journal, 282 (2015) 2339-2351.

[26] J.K. Cahn, C.A. Werlang, A. Baumschlager, S. Brinkmann-Chen, S.L. Mayo, F.H. Arnold, A General Tool for Engineering the NAD/NADP Cofactor Preference of Oxidoreductases, ACS synthetic biology, 6 (2017) 326-333.

[27] Y.e. al, Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of glucose dehydrogenase from Bacillus megaterium IWG3, crystallization papers, (2000) 1443-1445.

[28] G.K. Keizo Yamamoto, Masami Kusunoki, Shiro Tabata, Itaru Urabe, and Shigeyoshi Osaki, Crystal Structure of Glucose Dehydrogenase from Bacillus megaterium IWG3 at 1.7A Resolution., J. Biochem, (2001) 303-312.

[29] S.H. Baik, T. Ide, H. Yoshida, O. Kagami, S. Harayama, Significantly enhanced stability of glucose dehydrogenase by directed evolution, Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 61 (2003) 329-335.

[30] S.H. Baik, F. Michel, N. Aghajari, R. Haser, S. Harayama, Cooperative effect of two surface amino acid mutations (Q252L and E170K) in glucose dehydrogenase from Bacillus megaterium IWG3 on stabilization of its oligomeric state, Applied and environmental microbiology, 71 (2005) 3285-3293.

[31] S. Brinkmannchen, T. Flock, J.K. Cahn, C.D. Snow, E.M. Brustad, J.A. Mcintosh, P. Meinhold, L. Zhang, F.H. Arnold, General approach to reversing ketol-acid reductoisomerase cofactor dependence from NADPH to NADH, Pnas, 110 (2013) 10946-10951.

[32] A. Lerchner, A. Jarasch, A. Skerra, Engineering of alanine dehydrogenase from Bacillus subtilis for novel cofactor specificity, Biotechnol Appl Biochem, 63 (2016) 616-624.

[33] H.T. Ding, Y.Q. Du, D.F. Liu, Z.L. Li, X.J. Chen, Y.H. Zhao, Cloning and expression in E. coli of an organic solvent-tolerant and alkali-resistant glucose 1-dehydrogenase from Lysinibacillus sphaericus G10, Bioresour Technol, 102 (2011) 1528-1536.