Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Architecture and Geotechnical Engineering, 2026, 8(1); doi: 10.25236/AJAGE.2026.080113.

Embodied Carbon Footprint Comparative Analysis: Screw Piles Versus Cast-in-Place Piles in Foundation Engineering

Author(s)

Jiaxin Lu1, Dengke Pu2

Corresponding Author:
Dengke Pu
Affiliation(s)

1School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 610031, China

2Sichuan Yanjiang Yijin Expressway Co., Ltd., Xichang, 615099, China

Abstract

To address the carbon neutrality objectives within the highway construction sector, this research employs a three-tier analytical framework to resolve the debate concerning carbon emissions associated with screw piles and cast-in-place piles. Utilizing methodologies such as quota-based data modeling, and engineering functional adaptability assessment, the study consolidates emission factors across the entire lifecycle chain—encompassing material production, transportation, construction, and processing. This integration enables the development of a refined carbon accounting model for the pile materialization stage. Monte Carlo simulation is leveraged to quantify the impact of parameter uncertainty, incorporating a case study from highways in the Hang-Jia-Hu Plain. This approach establishes, for the first time, a carbon performance assessment framework benchmarked against bearing capacity requirements. Static analysis reveals that under equal volume conditions, the carbon emissions of screw piles primarily originate from steel consumption, with a total carbon footprint 2.78 times higher than that of cast-in-place piles. Sensitivity analyses indicate that cast-in-place pile emissions exhibit significant sensitivity to transport distance, material recovery rate, and vehicle type, whereas the prefabricated nature of screw piles results in considerably weaker parametric responses.

Keywords

Highway Engineering; Carbon Footprint; Cast-in-Place Piles; Screw Piles

Cite This Paper

Jiaxin Lu, Dengke Pu. Embodied Carbon Footprint Comparative Analysis: Screw Piles Versus Cast-in-Place Piles in Foundation Engineering. Academic Journal of Architecture and Geotechnical Engineering (2026), Vol. 8, Issue 1: 104-111. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJAGE.2026.080113.

References

[1] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926

[2] Zhang, H.-N., Shen, R.-R., Zhang, X.-P., Kang, J.-J., & Yuan, J.-H. (2022). Implications and pathways of China’s carbon neutrality: A review. Climate Change Research, 18(2), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2021.058

[3] Gao, S. (2024). Quantitative analysis of carbon emissions from highway construction based on life cycle assessment. Sustainability, 16(14), 5897. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145897

[4] Li, X.-J., & Zheng, Y.-D. (2019). Using LCA to research carbon footprint for precast concrete piles during the building construction stage: a China study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118754

[5] Nascimento, M. F., Mota, E. G., Silva, D. R., & Lima, J. (2024). Review on carbon footprint in deep foundations: Case study for helical piles in Brasília, DF. In Proceedings of ECSMGE XVIII.

[6] Lyu, F., Shao, H., & Zhang, W. (2022). Comparative analysis about carbon emission of precast pile and cast-in-situ pile. Energy Reports, 8, 514–525.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.101

[7] Ministry of Transport of the People‘s Republic of China. (2018a). Highway engineering budget quota (JTG/T 3832-2018). China Communications Press.

[8] Zhang, Y., Peng, T., Yuan, C., & Yang, P. (2023). Assessment of carbon emissions at the logistics and transportation stage of prefabricated buildings. Applied Sciences, 13(1), 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010552

[9] Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Peng, Y., Feng, Y., & Mao, C. (2016). Uncertainty analysis for measuring greenhouse gas emissions in the building construction phase: A case study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 183–195.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.085

[10] de Bortoli, A., Bouhaya, L., & Feraille, A. (2025). A life cycle model for high-speed rail infrastructure: environmental inventories and assessment of the Tours-Bordeaux railway in France. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[11] Zhang, X., Wang, Y., & Liu, Z. (2019). Quota-based carbon tracing model for construction processes in China. Building and Environment, 160, 106183. 

[12] Guo, C., & Xu, J. (2020). Study on calculation method and prediction model of carbon emission from highway tunnel construction [Doctoral dissertation, Southwest Jiaotong University]. Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu. https://doi.org/10.27414/d.cnki.gxnju.2021.000024

[13] Standardization Administration of China. (2019). Building carbon emission calculation standard (GB/T 51366-2019). China Standards Press.

[14] Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. (2018b). Highway engineering machinery operating hour cost quota. China Communications Press.

[15] Bao, X., Shen, J., & Zhang, Y. (2024). GHG emission analysis of an optimal arrangement of stiffened composite pile group based on bearing capacity: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 140860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140860

[16] Marsh, E., Orr, J., & Ibell, T. (2021). Quantification of uncertainty in product stage embodied carbon calculations for buildings. Energy and Buildings, 251, 111340. 

[17] Yu, X., Hu, X. D., Xie, W., Pan, A. C., Li, X. K., & Wang, H. J. (2025). Carbon emission modeling of excavation and non-excavation techniques in overall repair of drainage pipelines. Systems and Soft Computing, 7, 200213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sasc.2025.200213