Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2026, 8(6); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2026.080608.
Jinkai Ke
China National Tendering Center of Mach. & Elec. Equipment (Government Procurement Center of MIIT), Beijing, China
Amid increasingly complex shifts in the international carbon regulatory regime and the intensification of green trade barriers, Chinese export enterprises are confronted with difficulties in achieving mutual recognition of carbon footprints. Building energy-carbon management centers constitutes an effective pathway to address these difficulties. Accordingly, this study systematically investigates upstream and downstream stakeholders involved in the construction of such centers, including system and technical service providers, manufacturing enterprises, and firms with green supply chain requirements. The findings reveal that enterprises generally advance energy-carbon management through models such as self-built center systems, public service platforms, or third-party services, achieving phased progress in improving policy frameworks, fostering local pilot innovations, and enhancing management efficiency. Nevertheless, deep-seated problems remain salient, including inadequate data traceability in energy-carbon management, incompatible standard systems that hinder international mutual recognition, and data security concerns that impede platform-based participation. To tackle these issues, efforts should be directed toward establishing a whole-industry-chain carbon data traceability system, promoting international alignment and mutual recognition of carbon accounting standards, and constructing secure and trustworthy public energy-carbon management centers, thereby systematically strengthening enterprises’ carbon management capabilities and international competitiveness.
energy-carbon management center, carbon footprint mutual recognition, green trade barriers
Jinkai Ke. Building Corporate Energy-Carbon Management Centers: Models, Bottlenecks, and Optimization Pathways. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2026), Vol. 8, Issue 6: 65-71. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2026.080608.
[1] Jalo K G, Bennati S, Anglani N. Energy Diagnosis And Management: An Approach For Industry To Start A Pathway To Carbon Neutrality[J]. 2024 9th International Youth Conference on Energy (IYCE), 2024.
[2] Tian Y, Ou L, Guo J, et al.. A Configuration Of Green And Low-Carbon Strategy In Clean Energy Economy: A Perspective Of Supply Chain Management[J]. Energy, 2025.
[3] Cao Z, Li Z, Yang C. Credible Joint Chance-Constrained Low-Carbon Energy Management For Multi-Energy Microgrids[J]. Applied Energy, 2025.
[4] Zhou Y, Bu W. Artificial Intelligence Adoption, Energy Management, And Corporate Energy Transition: Evidence From Energy Consumption, Energy Intensity, And Carbon Emission Intensity[J]. Energies (19961073), 2026(3).
[5] Chang W, Liu C, Ren G, et al.. Energy Management For Distributed Carbon-Neutral Data Centers[J]. Energies (19961073), 2025(11).
[6] Li X, Deng J, Liu J. Energy–Carbon–Green Certificates Management Strategy For Integrated Energy System Using Carbon–Green Certificates Double-Direction Interaction[J]. Renewable energy, 2025(Jan.).
[7] Zhu Y, Wang Y, Hou S, et al.. Enhancing Carbon Neutrality Through Renewable Energy And Demand-Side Management[J]. Journal of Thermal Engineering, 2025(5).
[8] Zhang X, Lyu J, Wang Z, et al.. Low Carbon Regional Energy Management System With Conditional Value At Risk[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025.
[9] Sui L, Sun S, Shang N, et al.. Optimal Energy Management For Mutil-Energy Microgrid Considering Ladder-Type Carbon Emissions Trading[J]. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 2024.
[10] Ding C X, Zhong S, Li S, et al.. Regulatory-Driven Optimization Of Integrated Energy Systems: A Legal And Policy-Compliant Framework For Flexibility And Carbon Management[J]. Energy Reports, 2025.
[11] Guo W, Cai Y, Dong W, et al.. Research On The Management Method Of New Integrated Energy System Considering Carbon Emission Reduction[J]. Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils, 2025(6).