Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2026, 8(5); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2026.080503.

Push or Pull? The Dual Forces of Environmental Policies and Social Networks on Farmers’ Green Production Behavior

Author(s)

Linli Jiang, Wei Hou, Surong He

Corresponding Author:
Linli Jiang
Affiliation(s)

School of Economics and Management, Wuyi University, Jiangmen, China

Abstract

Green production is a mode of production to achieve resource conservation, reduce ecological environment pollution and sustainable agricultural development. It is crucial to promote sustainable agricultural development, ensure food safety for consumers and maintain rural ecological balance. The results show that: (1) Agricultural environmental policies play a pivotal role in influencing farmers’ green pest management practices. (2) Rural social networks are a crucial factor affecting farmers’ rational fertilization practices. (3) Value identification plays a significant mediating role in the impact of public participation-based environmental policies on green pest management practices and in the influence of social networks on rational fertilization practices.

Keywords

Environmental Policy; Social Networks; Green Production Behavior

Cite This Paper

Linli Jiang, Wei Hou, Surong He. Push or Pull? The Dual Forces of Environmental Policies and Social Networks on Farmers’ Green Production Behavior. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2026), Vol. 8, Issue 5: 15-22. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2026.080503.

References

[1] Kansanga M, Andersen P, Kpienbaareh D, et al. Traditional agriculture in transition: Examining the impacts of agricultural modernization on smallholder farming in Ghana under the new Green Revolution[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2019, 26(1): 11-24.

[2] Hossain A, Krupnik T J, Timsina J, et al. Agricultural land degradation: processes and problems undermining future food security[M]//Environment, climate, plant and vegetation growth. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020: 17-61.

[3] Qiao D, Li N, Cao L, et al. How agricultural extension services improve farmers’ organic fertilizer use in China? The perspective of neighborhood effect and ecological cognition[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(12): 7166.

[4] Kutter T, Louwagie G, Schuler J, et al. Policy measures for agricultural soil conservation in the European Union and its member states: policy review and classification[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2011, 22(1): 18-31.

[5] Conley T G, Udry C R. Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana[J]. American economic review, 2010, 100(1): 35-69.

[6] Björkegren D, Karaca B C. Network adoption subsidies: A digital evaluation of a rural mobile phone program in Rwanda[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2022, 154: 102762.

[7] Douglas Creed W E, Hudson B A, Okhuysen G A, et al. Swimming in a sea of shame: Incorporating emotion into explanations of institutional reproduction and change[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2014, 39(3): 275-301.

[8] McEvily B, Perrone V, Zaheer A. Trust as an organizing principle[J]. Organization science, 2003, 14(1): 91-103.

[9] Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.

[10] Timprasert S, Datta A, Ranamukhaarachchi S L. Factors determining adoption of integrated pest management by vegetable growers in Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand[J]. Crop protection, 2014, 62: 32-39.

[11] Wen Z, Chang L, Hau K T, et al. Testing and application of the mediating effects[J]. Acta psychologica sinica, 2004, 36(05): 614.