Grounded in a phenomenologically oriented methodological stance, this study integrates body schema theory with postphenomenology’s perspective on technological mediation to offer an interpretive analysis of the mode of spatial-computing presence manifested by Apple Vision Pro. By performing an epoché of established categories such as “virtual vs. real” and “digital twin vs. simulation,” the research develops phenomenological descriptions and analyses of intentional structures around key interaction mechanisms, including gaze, gesture, spatial anchoring, occlusion, and perspective. Through imaginative variation, it further distills the stable elements of the device’s experiential structure. The study argues that spatial computing does not generate a virtual space or a twin space; rather, it configures a condition of “spatial fusion” in which the digital and the physical can be freely superimposed. Within this condition, cyborg practice unfolds with the body as interface, while the body schema coordinates perception and action at a pre-reflective level. Digital technology, as an auxiliary presence for perception, co-constitutes with the body a new constitutive condition.

Wu Jing. From Virtuality to Spatial Fusion: A Phenomenological Account of Vision Pro through Body Schema and Technological Mediation. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2026), Vol. 9, Issue 3: 8-14. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2026.090302.

[1] Sun, W. (2018). The communicator’s body: Communication and presence—The evolution of the conscious subject, the body-subject, and the intelligent subject. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 40(12), 83–103.

[2] Li Jinquan. (2014). Paradigms and identity of communication research: Some preliminary personal reflections. Communication Research and Practice, 4(1), 1–20.

[3] Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

[4] Merleau-Ponty, M. (2010). Phenomenology of perception (D. A. Landes, Trans.). London, England: Routledge.

[5] Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

[6] Ovide, S. (2024, February 2). Apple’s Vision Pro is “spatial computing.” Nobody knows what it means. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/02/02/apple-vision-pro-what-is-spatial-computing-ar-vr/

[7] Greenwold, S. (2003). Spatial computing (Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Retrieved from https://acg.media.mit.edu/people/simong/thesis/SpatialComputing.pdf

[8] Balakrishnan, S., Hameed, M. S. S., Venkatesan, K., & Aswin, G. (2021). Interaction of spatial computing in augmented reality. In 2021 7th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS) (Vol. 1, pp. 1900–1904). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCS51430.2021.9442010

[9] Li Shuangchen. Zhang Wenbing, Chen Liying, Liang Ze, Zhang Yajuan, Wang Zheng. (2022). Twin space and its applications: On the reconstruction of geographic research space. Acta Geographica Sinica, 77(3), 507–517.

[10] Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

[11] Sutherland, I. E. (1965). The ultimate display. In Proceedings of the IFIP Congress 65 (Vol. 2, pp. 506–508). Retrieved from https://worrydream.com/refs/Sutherland_1965_-_The_Ultimate_Display.pdf

[12] Ouyang, C. (2015). Critiques of contemporary Western body studies. Beijing, China: Chinese Social Sciences Press.

[13] Head, H., & Holmes, G. (1911). Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain, 34(2–3), 102–254. 

[14] Hoffmann, M., Marques, H. G., Hernandez Arieta, A., Sumioka, H., Lungarella, M., & Pfeifer, R. (2010). Body schema in robotics: A review. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 2(4), 304–324. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2010.2086454

[15] Haraway, D. J. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/34.2-3.102

[16] Alloa, E. (2016). Resistance of the sensible: Merleau-Ponty’s critique of transparency (X. Qu, Trans.). Fuzhou, China: Fujian Education Press.

[17] He, J. (2013). Body image and body schema: Studies in embodied cognition. Shanghai, China: East China Normal University Press.

[18] Jensen, K. B. (2012). Media convergence: The three dimensions of network communication, mass communication, and interpersonal communication (Jun. Liu, Trans.). Shanghai, China: Fudan University Press.

[19] Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. New York, NY: Harper & Row.https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2023/06/introducing-apple-vision-pro/