Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2026, 8(3); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2026.080309.

Dilemmas and Responses to the Failure of Prompt Corrective Action by the Deposit Insurance Agency

Author(s)

Gao Xiaowen1, Lou Jie2

Corresponding Author:
Lou Jie
Affiliation(s)

1School of Foreign Languages and Business, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China

2School of Foreign Languages and Business, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China

Abstract

China has proposed “establishing a binding system for Prompt Corrective Action to deal with financial risks”. As a core component of Prompt Corrective Action, China’s current deposit insurance system is confronted with the dilemma of insufficient capacity to deal with financial risks. The primary causes lie in the ambiguous legal status of the Deposit Insurance Agency, the unclear division of powers and responsibilities between the Deposit Insurance Agency and other regulatory authorities, and a lack of necessary powers for the Deposit Insurance Agency. Legislation should define the legal status of the Deposit Insurance Agency as an independent regulatory authority, delineate the boundaries of responsibilities between the Deposit Insurance Agency and banking supervisors in the process of early risk identification and resolution, and grant the Deposit Insurance Agency powers to obtain information, conduct bank examinations, issue risk warnings, adjust insurance premium rates, and recommend early corrective actions to banking supervisors.

Keywords

Financial Risk Prevention and Control; Deposit Insurance System; Prompt Corrective Action; Financial Regulation; Financial Stability Law

Cite This Paper

Gao Xiaowen, Lou Jie. Dilemmas and Responses to the Failure of Prompt Corrective Action by the Deposit Insurance Agency. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2026), Vol. 8, Issue 3: 79-87. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2026.080309.

References

[1] Guo, J. (2017). Exploration the problem of power of early correction by the deposit insurance fund management institution. Journal of Political Science and Law, (1), 55–63.

[2] Zhao, R. (2021). Economic transition and people's livelihood. The Commercial Press.

[3] Xi, J. (2018, April 3). Speech at the first meeting of the Central Commission for Financial and Economic Affairs of the 19th CPC Central Committee. People's Daily.

[4] Huang, W. (2024). On preventive rule of law. Chinese Journal of Law, (2), 20–38.

[5] Diamond, D. W., & Dybvig, P. H. (1983). Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), 401–419.

[6] Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-242, 103 Stat. 183 (1991).

[7] Rom, M. (1990). FSLIC's downfall. Policy Studies Journal, 18(3), 786–791.

[8] Huang, H. (2019). The logics and path of China's financial regulatory structure reform: International experiences and local choice. The Jurist, (3), 124–137.

[9] Lu, M., & Ouyang, W. (2023). Research on regulatory system reform from the perspective of modern financial governance system. Economist, (8), 86–94.

[10] Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. MIT Press, 393.

[11]Macey, J. R. (1989). The political science of regulating bank risk. Ohio State Law Journal, 49, 1277–1298.

[12] Zhang, B. (2020). From hazard prevention to risk precaution: The risk transformation and institutional adjustment of environmental governance. Legal Forum, (1), 22–30.

[13] Guo, Q. (2002). A comparison of relevant regulations on the implementation of prompt corrective action in the USA, Japan, and China. Economic Research Journal, (2), 1–24.

[14] Chen, J., & Zhang, T. (2018). Risk resolution of financial institutions in East Asia. Law Press., 155.

[15] Yue, W. (2024). The corporate law logic of creditor protection: From the perspective of the functional deficiency of conduct law and the functional filling of organizational law. Politics and Law, (2), 80–96.

[16] Jin, Y. (2018). The prompt corrective action system for deposit insurance: Theoretical analysis and empirical lessons. Shanghai Finance, (6), 53–57.

[17] Xia, Y. (1999). Public law. Law Press China., 389

[18] Sun, W. (2013). On the criteria for distinguishing between private law and public law. Journal of Central South University (Social Sciences), (4), 49–55.

[19] Yang, C. (2017). On the state's obligation to protect basic rights: Focusing on the development of German constitutional jurisprudence. Angle Publishing Co., Ltd,126.

[20] Wang, Y. (2016). Research on the legal system of public funds bailout for failing banks. Law Press China, 43.

[21] Chen, M. (2019). Law and policy. Angle Publishing Co., Ltd, 150.

[22] Ogus, A. (2008). Regulation: Legal form and economic theory (M. Luo & M. Su, Trans.). China Renmin University Press, 60.

[23] Feng, L. (2021). Research on the normalization of the joint legislation by ministries and commissions under the State Council. Political Science and Law, (3), 2–15.

[24] Wang, D., & Jin, W. (2017). The pursuit of formal rationality in public regulation and its limits. Gansu Social Sciences, (5), 122–128.

[25] Chen, C. (2004). Legal research on underwriting risk control in deposit insurance. National Taiwan University Law Journal, (5), 95–152.

[26] Tang, Z. (2007). Legal analysis of administrative coordination mechanisms and their rule-of-law construction in China. Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences), (4), 525–528.