Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering Technology, 2025, 7(4); doi: 10.25236/IJFET.2025.070410.

Improvement and Efficiency Evaluation of Oily Wastewater Treatment Technology in Oil Production

Author(s)

Guangchao Zhi

Corresponding Author:
Guangchao Zhi
Affiliation(s)

CNOOC Ener Tech-Drilling & Production Co., Tianjin, China

Abstract

The oily wastewater generated during the oil extraction process has complex components, including crude oil, suspended solids, heavy metals and refractory organic matter. If discharged directly, it seriously pollutes water bodies and soil, threatening the ecological environment and human health. It is one of the core problems of environmental protection management in the oil industry. Existing oily wastewater treatment processes (such as single coagulation, flotation, and membrane separation) generally have problems such as low treatment efficiency, large dosage of chemicals, high operating costs, and easy generation of secondary pollution. It is difficult to meet the stringent emission standards and industrial application requirements. This paper first sorts out the research status and shortcomings of oily wastewater treatment, and then proposes a technical solution of "pretreatment optimization-deep treatment coupling-multi-dimensional performance evaluation". By optimizing the coagulant formula to improve the pretreatment effect, the "coagulation-ultrafiltration membrane separation" coupling process is constructed to strengthen deep treatment. At the same time, a comprehensive performance evaluation system covering treatment efficiency, cost, and stability is established. The experimental investigation results show that when the initial oil concentration is 500 mg/L (simulating the actual oil production wastewater concentration), the oil removal rate of the coupling process reaches 99.0%, the COD removal rate is 87.6%, and the suspended solids removal rate is 98.2%, with the removal rate significantly improved.

Keywords

Oily Wastewater Treatment; Coagulation-Ultrafiltration Membrane Coupling Process; Performance Evaluation; Coagulant Optimization

Cite This Paper

Guangchao Zhi. Improvement and Efficiency Evaluation of Oily Wastewater Treatment Technology in Oil Production. International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering Technology (2025), Vol. 7, Issue 4: 70-76. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFET.2025.070410.

References

[1] Tian Y, Liu F, Shi M, et al. Treatment of Wastewater Containing Emulsified Oil Using Flat Ceramic Membranes[J]. Journal of Ceramics, 2025, 46(1):167-174. 

[2] Lu X, Shen L, Chen C, et al. Advance of self-cleaning separation membranes for oil-containing wastewater treatment[J]. Environmental Functional Materials, 2024, 3(1):72-93. 

[3] Komatsu K. Anaerobic MBR for High Organic Wastewater Treatment and Biogas Recovery[J]. JAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL, 2022, 76(12):1045-1049. 

[4] Gruzinova V, Romanovski V. Optimizing Oil-Contaminated Wastewater Purification with Aluminum Coagulants[J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2025, 236(5):1-14. 

[5] Li X W, Cui Z Y, Zhao X L. An advanced treatment process for 3-high wastewater discharged from crude oil storage tanks[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(42):95875-95891. 

[6] Husen A K, Bidira F, Bekel E A, et al. Color, COD, and turbidity removal from surface water by using linseed and alum coagulants: optimization through response surface methodology[J]. Applied Water Science, 2024, 14(9):1-16. 

[7] Devanathan R, Babu R S, Prasanna K. Correction to: A conceptual review on performance and environmental impact of current and ensuing coagulants used in treatment facilities[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2024, 21(15):9819. 

[8] Shen S, Xia W, Zhang LuoYu PanPan HuLongguan ZhangHongtao ShiHu Yang. Enhanced sludge dewaterability using a bifunctional hybrid coagulant[J]. Chemosphere, 2023, 344(Dec.):140323.

[9] Adib D, Mafigholami R, Tabeshkia H, et al. Optimization of polypropylene microplastics removal using conventional coagulants in drinking water treatment plants via response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 2022, 20(1):565-577. 

[10] Xueying L, Sujie S, Yong D H. Effects of different modifying agents on the preparation and properties of coagulants derived from excess sludge[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(44):99762-99773. 

[11] Okey-Onyesolu C F, Chukwuma E C, Okoye C C, et al. Application of fish bone Chitosan-Protein Bio-coagulant for abattoir wastewater treatment: Comparative process optimization and evaluation[J]. Waste Management Bulletin, 2023, 1(1):49-59. 

[12] Jose S, Rajashekara R, Nagaraju R P. Evaluation Efficacy of Natural Coagulant Moringa oleifera Seeds and Bark in the Treatment of Domestic Sullage[J]. Indian journal of environmental protection, 2023, 43(9):843-849. 

[13] Morgacheva E A, Myakisheva A V, Pugacheva I N, et al. A promising coagulant for the production of emulsion rubbers[J]. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 2024, 86(3):244-249.