Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2026, 8(5); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2026.080507.

Configurational Paths to Enhancing Innovation Performance in SRDI Enterprises under Digital Transformation

Author(s)

Shiwei Liu, Jizhong Wu

Corresponding Author:
Shiwei Liu
Affiliation(s)

Business School , University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

Abstract

This paper examines how SMEs can use digital tools to strengthen innovation capacity. Departing from traditional single-factor or single-case analyses, it draws on data from 105 listed Chinese “Little Giant” firms, using a comparative configurational approach to explore how technological, organizational, and external factors shape innovation. Our main findings are threefold:(1) No single factor alone explains innovation performance differences. (2) We identify three effective configurations for high innovation: internal capability-centered, technology-led, and policy-supported.(3)A configuration marked by rigid routines and low adaptability is associated with weaker innovation. This study enriches digital transformation literature by highlighting strategic resource combination importance for SMEs, and offers practical implications for “Little Giant” firms to leverage digitalization for better innovation.

Keywords

Digital Transformation; SRDI Enterprises; Innovation Performance; fsQCA; Configuration Paths

Cite This Paper

Shiwei Liu, Jizhong Wu. Configurational Paths to Enhancing Innovation Performance in SRDI Enterprises under Digital Transformation. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2026), Vol. 8, Issue 5: 49-54. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2026.080507.

References

[1] Wu, C.C. (2025). Development of New Quality Productive Forces and Enterprise Supply Chain Resilience. Statistics & Decision, 41(17): 23-28.

[2] Ge, X. R., Qian, J. F., Li, C. S., et al. (2025). The Spatial Pattern and Causes of Specialized and Sophisticated "Little Giant" Enterprises in Three Major Urban Agglomerations from the Perspective of New Quality Productive Forces. Economic Geography, 45(09): 98-109. 

[3] Dong, Z. Y., & Li, C. M. (2021). High-Quality Development Situation and Path Selection of "Specialized, Refined, Distinctive, and Innovative" Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Reform, (10): 1-11. 

[4] Shi, D. W., Yang, L. C., & Cheng, D. J. (2025). Resource Logic or Competition Logic? The Impact of High-Quality SME Cultivation Policies on Innovation of Non-Designated Enterprises. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 42(19): 132-141. 

[5] He, Y., & Liang, X. C. (2025). Research on the Mechanism of Digital Transformation Enabling High-Quality Development of SMEs: A Co-Evolutionary Perspective of Multiple Trajectories Based on the TOE Framework. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 27(05): 3-18. 

[6] Yuan, C., Xiao, T. S., Geng, C. X., et al. (2021). Digital Transformation and Firm Division of Labor: Specialization or Vertical Integration. China Industrial Economics, (09): 137-155.

[7] Sadeghi, V. J., & Biancone, P. P. (2018). How Micro, Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises Are Driven Outward the Superior International Trade Performance? A Multidimensional Study on Italian Food Sector. Research in International Business and Finance, 45: 597-606. 

[8] Song, K. (2025). Research on the Impact of Supply Chain Digitalization on the Resilience of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Financial Theory and Practice, (08): 82-91.

[9] Feng, X., Kang, W. H., & Li, X. R. (2025). Government Subsidies, Market Competition, and Corporate Digital Transformation. Technology Economics and Management Research, (10): 110-115.

[10] Li, X. X., & Liu, C. L. (2013). Research on the Role of Organizational Slack in Difficult Situations: The Moderating Effect of Market Search Intensity. Nankai Business Review, 16(03): 140-148.

[11] Wu, J. Z., Zeng, X. J., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Top Management Team Attention and Corporate Innovation Strategy: The Moderating Role of CEO Duality and Organizational Slack. Science of Science and Technology Management, 37(05): 170-180.

[12] Sun, L., & Zhao, J. Y. (2023). How Does Organizational Slack Affect Firm Performance: A Logical Framework. Finance and Accounting Communications, (16): 9-14.

[13] Huang, K. X., & Fu, D. X. (2025). Research on the Impact of Executive Team Technical Background on Corporate Innovation Performance. Modern Industrial Economy and Information Technology, 15(05): 239-244.

[14] Tang, X., Gao, X., & Lai, X. B. (2022). Research on the Impact of Digital Transformation on Corporate Labor Productivity. Economic Review, (9): 104-112.

[15] Yi, L. X., Jiang, Y. C., & Yao, S. J. (2022). Research on the Value Creation Effect of Corporate ESG Practice: A Test from the Perspective of External Pressure. South China Economy, (10): 93-110.

[16] Wu, F., Hu, H. Z., Lin, H. Y., et al. (2021). Corporate Digital Transformation and Capital Market Performance: Empirical Evidence from Stock Liquidity. Management World, 37(07): 130-144.

[17] Yuan, R. L., Li, R. J., & Sun, J. (2021). Can Directors' Information Technology Background Curb Earnings Management? Nankai Business Review, (3): 139-151.

[18] Yang, L., Duan, M. Y., Liu, J., et al. (2018). Executive Team Overseas Experience, R&D Intensity, and Corporate Innovation Performance. Scientific Research Management, 39(06): 9-21.

[19] Ma, H. J., Wang, Y. J., & Su, Z. F. (2024). How Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Firms Leverage Digital Opportunities through Resource Orchestration in the Context of Digital Transformation: An fsQCA Study Based on Resource Orchestration Theory. Nankai Business Review, 27(04): 90-100.