Frontiers in Educational Research, 2025, 8(8); doi: 10.25236/FER.2025.080820.
Yinan Wang
School of Management, Liaoning University of International Business and Economics, Dalian, Liaoning, China
Based on the theoretical perspective of systems theory, this paper constructs a four-dimensional structure model of the management and education system in colleges and universities, revealing the evolution path of management and education from the dispersion of elements to system integration, and providing a theoretical framework for solving the problems of "insufficient element coordination" and "rigid mechanism" in the current management and education in colleges and universities. Research shows that the management education system achieves structured operation through three major characteristics: hierarchical nature, integrity, and dynamic balance. Its effectiveness depends on the coordinated effect of the decision-making guarantee mechanism, incentive and restraint mechanism, innovation leading mechanism, and cultural guarantee mechanism. During the dynamic operation process, the interactivity between the subject and the object is the core driving force for the evolution of the system, while the neutrality of the medium and the plasticity of the ring together constitute the environmental support system.
Systems Theory Management Nurtures People; Structured Operation Implementation Mechanism; Higher Education Management
Yinan Wang. Research on the Structured Operating Mechanism of University Management and Education from the Perspective of Systems Theory. Frontiers in Educational Research (2025), Vol. 8, Issue 8: 129-134. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2025.080820.
[1] Setó-Pamies D, Papaoikonomou E. Sustainable Development Goals: A Powerful Framework for Embedding Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability in Management Education[J]. Sustainability. 2020, 12(5):1762. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051762
[2] Figueiró P S, Neutzling D M, Lessa B. Education for sustainability in higher education institutions: A multi-perspective proposal with a focus on management education[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 339: 130539.
[3] Rapp A C, Corral-Granados A. Understanding inclusive education–a theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist perspective[J]. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2024, 28(4): 423-439.
[4] Rapp A C, Corral-Granados A. Understanding inclusive education–a theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist perspective [J]. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2024, 28(4): 423-439.
[5] Azzolini Júnior W, Santos C H, Romano A L, et al. Integration of simulation and hierarchical approach to support lean implementation[J]. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 2025, 24(1): 111-122.
[6] Blumenhagen R, Cribiori N, Gligovic A, et al. Emergence of R4-terms in M-theory[J]. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2024, 2024(7): 1-45.
[7] Rapanta C, Botturi L, Goodyear P, et al. Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: Post-pandemic challenges for higher education[J]. Postdigital Science and Education, 2021, 3(3): 715-742.
[8] Hu M, Mirhosseini S A, Mendoza A. Only a cog in a machine? Reappraising institutionalized EAP teacher identities in a transnational context [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2024, 71: 101427.
[9] Altinay Z, Altinay F, Sharma R C, et al. Capacity building for student teachers in learning, teaching artificial intelligence for quality of education [J]. Societies, 2024, 14(8): 148.
[10] Aramburuzabala P, Culcasi I, Cerrillo R. Service-learning and digital empowerment: the potential for the digital education transition in higher education [J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(6): 2448.
[11] Gravina A G, Pellegrino R, Palladino G, et al. Charting new AI education in gastroenterology: cross-sectional evaluation of ChatGPT and perplexity AI in medical residency exam[J]. Digestive and liver disease, 2024, 56(8): 1304-1311.