In an era where digital technology is deeply integrated into all sectors, the education and sports industries are undergoing profound transformation. Digital transformation has accelerated the integration of education and sports, emerging as a globally recognized developmental trend. As leading countries in Asia’s digital advancement, China, Japan, and South Korea have actively explored the integration of education and sports, forming distinctive and innovative pathways. This study systematically analyzes the impact of the digital wave on the education and sports industries, delving into the mechanisms through which digital transformation promotes educational innovation, upgrades the sports industry, and facilitates social development. By comparing the three countries in terms of policy orientation, practical models, and technological applications, the study identifies the characteristics of their respective integration pathways. Furthermore, it proposes targeted development strategies including enhancing policy coordination, deepening technological innovation, optimizing talent cultivation, and expanding international cooperation. The aim is to provide theoretical insights and practical references for high-quality education-sports integration in East Asia, ultimately enhancing the global competitiveness and influence of the education and sports sectors in China, Japan, and South Korea.

Nika Ma, Guohong Ning. A Comparative Study on the Innovative Pathways of Education-Sports Integration in China, Japan, and South Korea under Digital Transformation. Frontiers in Sport Research (2025), Vol. 7, Issue 4: 87-92. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSR.2025.070414.

[1] Benitez, J., Arenas, A., Castillo, A., & Esteves, J. (2022). Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information & Management, 59, 103590.

[2] Guo, L., & Xu, L. Y. (2021). The effects of digital transformation on firm performance: Evidence from China’s manufacturing sector. Sustainability, 13, 12844.

[3] Murcia, M. (2021). Progressive and rational CSR as catalysts of new product introductions. Journal of Business Ethics, 174, 613–627.

[4] Broadstock, D., Matouk, R., Meyer, M., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 99–110.

[5] Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 450–463.

[6] Alsayegh, M. F., Rahman, R. A., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12, 3910.

[7] Frankowska, M., & Rzeczycki, A. (2020). Reshaping supply chain collaboration—The role of digital leadership in a networked organization. In Proceedings (pp. 353–364). Springer.

[8] Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52, 326–349.

[9] Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41, 223–238.

[10] Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 1027–1047.

[11] Parfitt, C. (2020). ESG integration treats ethics as risk, but whose ethics and whose risk? Responsible investment in the context of precarity and risk-shifting. Critical Sociology, 46, 573–587.

[12] Mohammad, W. W. M., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure, competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 2, 100015.

[13] Nekhili, M., Boukadhaba, A., Nagati, H., & Chtioui, T. (2021). ESG performance and market value: The moderating role of employee board representation. Journal of Human Resource Management, 32, 3061–3087.

[14] Biggart, N. W., & Hamilton, G. G. (1987). An institutional theory of leadership. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 429–441.

[15] Gelan VE (2020) Happiness and contemplation in Aristotle. In: Dumitru M, Iftode C, Totu S (eds) 2400 years of thinking with Aristotle, Editura Universității din București, Bucharest, pp 89–98

[16] Gros F, Foucault M, Burchell G, Ewald F, Fontana A, Davidson AI (2005) The hermeneutics of the subject: lectures at the collège de France, 1981–1982 (Trans: Burchell G). Palgrave Macmillan, New York

[17] Grosso M (2002) Philosophical café for spiritual health: how to start one. Int J Philos Pract 1(3):89–91.