Real estate constitutes a significant component of marital community property. When a couple agrees to divorce by mutual consent, they may stipulate that jointly-owned property registered under one spouse's name be transferred to the other. However, before the property ownership is formally updated in the registration records, creditors of the registered owner may apply for enforcement against the property. Can the designated recipient under the agreement resist such enforcement? Such cases frequently arise in judicial practice, yet significant controversy persists over whether the designated recipient's rights can preclude enforcement. Within legal academia, scholars remain divided on whether third parties in such scenarios may challenge enforcement actions. Even among those who affirm such objection rights, the underlying justifications vary. An analysis of representative cases reveals three key contentious issues: How to determine the nature and validity of divorce property division agreements; On what legal grounds can divorce property division agreements resist enforcement? The criteria for evaluating whether a divorce property division agreement can preclude enforcement.

Yu Sida. Study on the Ability of Divorce Property Division Agreements to Defend against Enforcement Actions. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2025), Vol. 7, Issue 5: 34-39. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2025.070506.

[1] Li Bei. Marital Property Regimes in the Era of the Civil Code [J]. China Notary, 2023, (12): 46.

[2] Fan Liying. On the Real Right Changes Caused by Marital Property System Contracts [J]. Shandong Social Sciences, 2016, (05): 56-61.