Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2025, 7(7); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2025.070710.

Policy Implications of Data Element Marketization for Urban Green Development: A Concise Evidence-Based Report from China

Author(s)

Ying Hu

Corresponding Author:
Ying Hu
Affiliation(s)

Wuhan Vocational College of Software and Engineering, Wuhan, China

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of data element marketization on urban green development in China, using the staggered establishment of Big Data Trading Platforms in 269 prefecture-level cities as a quasi-natural experiment. Employing a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) approach, the results show that data element marketization significantly promotes urban green development, particularly by enhancing green technological innovation and FinTech development. The effect is stronger in cities with greater fiscal decentralization, lower fiscal pressure, more advanced market systems, and higher public environmental awareness. Moreover, the influence of local governments’ economic and environmental targets is found to be critical in shaping the green outcomes. This study contributes to the understanding of digital factors in sustainable urban governance and offers practical insights for future policy design in the digital economy era.

Keywords

Data Element Marketization; Urban Green Development; Green Technological Innovation; Fintech

Cite This Paper

Ying Hu. Policy Implications of Data Element Marketization for Urban Green Development: A Concise Evidence-Based Report from China. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2025), Vol. 7, Issue 7: 71-76. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2025.070710.

References

[1] Zheng, G., Zhang, X., & Zhao, X. (2024). Can data element marketization promote corporate green innovation—A quasi-natural experiment based on urban data trading platforms. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, (03), 33–48.

[2] Kong, Y., Liu, J., & Zhao, Z. (2021). Research on the marketization of data element allocation: Conceptual deconstruction, operational mechanisms, and practical pathways. The Economist, (11), 24–32.

[3] Li, L., & Li, H. (2021). Technological innovation, energy saving, emission reduction, and urban green development. Soft Science, (11), 46–51.

[4] Xiao, H., Sun, H., Wang, H., et al. (2022). From "pilot" to "diffusion": An analysis of the inclusive low-carbon growth effect of low-carbon city pilots. Industrial Economics Research, (3), 28–40.

[5] Guo, F., Wang, J., Wang, F., et al. (2020). Measuring China's digital financial inclusion development: Index construction and spatial characteristics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 19(4), 1401–1418.

[6] Fang, H., & Yang, S. (2021). Financial technology innovation and urban environmental pollution. Economic Dynamics, (8), 116–130.

[7] Yu, Y., Liu, D., & Gong, Y. (2019). Too much or too little? The constraints of local economic growth targets and total factor productivity. Management World, (07), 26–42+202.

[8] Li, Y., Zhang, T., & Qi, P. (2020). The impact of local environmental target constraints on economic growth. China Environmental Science, (10), 4617–4630.

[9] Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 254–277.

[10] Jiang, T. (2022). Mediating effects and moderating effects in empirical causal inference research. China Industrial Economics, (5), 100–120.