Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2025, 8(5); doi: 10.25236/FER.2025.080520.

The Ideal Role Orientation of the Director of the Office of the Secondary College of Higher Education

Author(s)

Luo Na1, Li Ang2

Corresponding Author:
Luo Na
Affiliation(s)

1Communication University of China, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Nanjing, 211172, China

2Zijin College, Nanjing University of Technology, Jiangsu, Nanjing, 210023, China

Abstract

This paper explores the ideal role orientation of office directors in secondary colleges across 24 Chinese undergraduate universities. Through a comprehensive analysis of job descriptions, it identifies core responsibilities such as institutional coordination, administrative support, leadership participation, and procedural management. The study constructs a four-dimensional framework encompassing the organizational environment, institutional mechanisms, interpersonal trust, and professional identity. Positioned at the intersection of academic and administrative systems, office directors are required to manage complex tasks, navigate role ambiguity, and foster effective communication across departments. Their role is essential for maintaining operational stability, enhancing governance efficiency, and supporting strategic development within higher education institutions. This research offers theoretical insights and practical implications for improving the professionalism and effectiveness of grassroots administrative teams in universities.

Keywords

Office Director, Role Attributes. Ideal Role

Cite This Paper

Luo Na, Li Ang. The Ideal Role Orientation of the Director of the Office of the Secondary College of Higher Education. Frontiers in Educational Research (2025), Vol. 8, Issue 5: 134-142. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2025.080520.

References

[1] Cao, S. W. (2021). Research on the role positioning dilemma and countermeasures of office directors in government and public institutions (Master’s thesis). East China Normal University.

[2] Huang, F. Q., & Shen, R. H. (2002). Construction of integrated modular curriculum for primary education majors. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, (9), 61–66.

[3] Ren, C. M. (2009). Research on role conflict of university deans in China (Doctoral dissertation). Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

[4] Yan, G. C. (2000). An analysis of the management characteristics of university organizations. Higher Education Research, (4), 53–57.

[5] Zhou, Z. Y. (2020). University governance in action: Principles of order and institutional implementation. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 41(2), 1–29.

[6] Wang, Z. J. (2018). How to achieve effective university governance: A perspective on governance structures. Research in Educational Development, 38(19), 36–41.

[7] Li, A. M. (2006). Research on professional positioning and reform of the university staff system (Doctoral dissertation). Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

[8] Zhang, D. X. (2002). Some thoughts on “reform of decision-making models in higher education and innovation of teaching and research organizations.” Journal of Dalian University, (5), 100–105.

[9] Martin, A. T. (1970). Reflections on the transition from mass to universal higher education. Daedalus, (1), 1–42.

[10] Ding, S. M. (1992). Using role theory to analyze social life in socialist society. Exploration and Free Views, (2), 60–63.